Ex-Ekiti Guber Aspirant Sues Senate’s Spokesman, Adaramodu, Others Over Constituency Projects

The Federal High Court in Ado-Ekiti has been asked to compel the senator representing Ekiti South Senatorial District, Sen Adeyemi Raphael Adaramodu to disclose details of their constituency funds, projects and budgetary allocations.

The suit was instituted by Adekunle Esan, a former governorship aspirant and indigene of llawe Ekiti in Ekiti South West Local Government Area of the state.

Other respondents/applicants in the suit are Hon. Adeniyi Rufus Ojuawo, member representing Ekiti South West/lkere/lse/Orun Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives; Tony Adaramodu, member representing Ekiti South West Constituency 1 in Ekiti State House of Assembly; and Chairman, Ekiti South West Local Government Area, Richard Apolola.

Esan said he approached the court after the respondents allegedly ignored his Freedom of Information (Fol) requests seeking explanations on how public funds allocated to the area were utilized under their custody.

In the originating summons, Esan asked the court to determine whether the respondents had violated his right to access public records under Chapter IV of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the Ekiti State Freedom of Information Law, 2011, by refusing or neglecting to release the requested information within the statutory period.

“Have the respondents not violated the right of the Applicant to access public records when they refused, neglected or failed to provide their scorecards as public officers and comprehensive reports of all budgetary sums allocated and disbursed as constituency projects?” the applicant queried.

In an affidavit deposed in support of the suit, Esan stated: “I am a former governorship aspirant in Ekiti State, a voter and an indigene of Ekiti South West Local Government Area, with an unwavering passion, zeal and commitment to the growth and development of Ekiti State and Nigeria.”

He alleged that respondents have not provided able representation to constituents at the National Assembly particularly taking into consideration the conditions of public infrastructure, security architecture, living conditions and abject state of things in the Senatorial District and Federal Constituency.

“On making enquiries, applicant was informed that billions of naira had been disbursed to his Senatorial District and Federal Constituency to the knowledge of the respondents have failed to effectively represent the constituents in ensuring the passage of laws steering funds allocated and abuse of constituency funds allocated for constituency projects amongst others,” according to the affidavit.

The applicant, the affidavit noted, was informed that those projects were allocated to the cronies of the respondents who have failed to carry out all the projects or use the funds disbursed to the good of the constituents.

He said despite the release of billions of naira for constituency projects to the local government area and Ekiti South West Constituency I, there had been little or no impact on the welfare of residents.

According to him: “the condition of public infrastructure, security architecture, living conditions and the general state of things in the local government area do not reflect the volume of funds allegedly released.”

Esan also alleged that some constituency projects were awarded to cronies of the respondents who allegedly failed to execute the projects or utilise the funds for the benefit of the people.

In the affidavit, he said: “I was informed that billions of naira had been disbursed to my local government area and state constituency and that the Respondents failed to effectively represent the constituents in ensuring good governance and proper utilisation of funds.”

The applicant told the court that by letters dated August 5, 2025, he formally requested information from the respondents pursuant to the FOl Law, including their scorecards, details of projects executed, motions and bills sponsored, budgetary allocations from 2019 to 2025, proposed allocations for 2026, and funds received from the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC).

In one of the FOl letters addressed to the local government chairman, the applicant requested “a comprehensive report of all disbursements received from FAAC and the Ekiti State Government, details of contracts awarded, procurements undertaken, staff strength, payroll cost, remuneration and budget performance from January 1, 2020 till date.”

He also stated in the letter that any failure, refusal or neglect to provide the requested information within the stipulated timeframe shall compel the Applicant to initiate legal proceedings by way of originating summons.

Esan, however, alleged that the respondents neither acknowledged the letters nor provided any justification for withholding the information.

“The Respondents received the requests but kept quiet. Their failure to respond within the statutory period amounted to a deemed refusal under the Freedom of Information Law,” he stated.

He is therefore asking the court to declare the respondents’ alleged refusal unlawful and to order them to release the requested documents within 14 days of judgment.

The applicant is also seeking N10 million in damages for the alleged violation of his right to access public information and N5 million as the cost of legal representation.

The court has directed the respondents to enter appearance within 30 days of being served with the summons.